Ministerial Direction 121 and 122: Who Gets Their Skilled Visa Processed First From 19 September 2026
By Matin Amirshahi, Registered Migration Agent (MARN 1685110)
Published 21 Sep 2026
Australia re-sorted its skilled visa queue on 19 September 2026. Ministerial Direction 121 now sets the processing order for the Skills in Demand visa (subclass 482), and Ministerial Direction 122 does the same for the permanent and regional skilled visas, including subclasses 186, 189, 190 and 491. Both replace Direction 119, which lasted eight weeks.
The change that matters most: if your occupation is in construction, healthcare, teaching, agriculture, aquaculture, fishing, resources, law enforcement or defence, your application now sits at the front of the queue whether you applied from inside or outside Australia. For everyone else, applying from inside Australia still comes first.
Applications already lodged and still waiting are re-sorted under the new order, so your place may have moved even though you did nothing.
Direction 119 was one rule covering eleven visa subclasses and the employer’s nomination (the sponsorship paperwork an employer lodges before a 482 or 186 visa). It has been split in two.
Direction 121 covers only subclass 482 visa applications. Direction 122 covers the other ten subclasses: 186, 187, 189, 190, 191, 489, 491, 494, 887 and 888.
Both were signed on 18 September 2026 and started the next day. Neither covers nominations. Direction 119 told visa officers which nominations to decide first; the new directions are silent on them, and as at 21 September 2026 the Department has not published a separate order for nominations.
Three other things changed:
Direction 121 puts subclass 482 applications in five tiers. The visa officer works from the top down.
Family members who apply together with the main applicant share that applicant’s tier. The order applies to the visa application only. Whether the visa is granted still depends on the usual criteria: the occupation, the salary, the skills assessment and the sponsor’s approval.
Direction 122 uses the same logic with four tiers, because there is no Specialist Skills stream in these visas.
The ten visas covered are the Employer Nomination Scheme (186), Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme (187), Skilled Independent (189), Skilled Nominated (190), Permanent Residence (Skilled Regional) (191), Skilled Regional Sponsored (489), Skilled Work Regional (491), Skilled Employer Sponsored Regional (494), Skilled Residence (887) and Business Skills (888).
Where a visa subclass is capped for the program year (the government sets a maximum number of grants under section 85 of the Migration Act), Direction 122 says the same order decides who gets a place first.
Both directions define the sectors by occupation code, not by industry or employer. Your nominated occupation (the ANZSCO code on the nomination or skills assessment) decides it. The definitions are the same in Direction 121 and Direction 122.
Two things follow. A nurse is in; a hospital administrator is not. A carpenter is in; a project manager outside unit group 1331 is not. The full lists are in the definitions section of each direction on the Department’s skilled visa processing priorities page.
Only outside the top tier. Under Direction 119, a nurse who applied from Tehran or Manila sat two tiers below the same nurse applying from Melbourne. From 19 September 2026 they sit in the same tier, at the front. That is the change offshore applicants in the priority sectors have been waiting for.
If your occupation is not in a priority sector, the old pattern holds. An applicant who lodged from inside Australia is processed before one who lodged from overseas, and an overseas applicant whose partner or children applied with them sits in the last tier of all.
The test is where the main applicant was on the day the application was lodged, not where they are now.
Both directions apply to every application that had not been decided by 19 September 2026. Nothing continues under Direction 119. An application lodged in June 2026 is sorted the same way as one lodged today.
A few categories sit outside both directions. They do not apply to applications sent back by the Administrative Review Tribunal (ART) for a fresh decision, or to applications where the ART has already substituted its own decision.
They also do not apply to applications that plainly cannot meet the visa criteria, or to family members who applied separately from a main applicant who was in Australia at the time.
Yes, and in some cases they must. Both directions require the visa officer to depart from the standard order for a particular application where they are satisfied it involves compelling circumstances.
Direction 121 gives three examples: circumstances affecting community safety, the continuity of essential religious, cultural or community services in Australia, and Australia’s international relations. Direction 122 is limited to the first two.
This is a narrow door. It is written for cases like a religious leader whose congregation has no one else, or a worker a police service cannot wait for. It is not a general way to ask for faster processing.
For most applicants, no. The re-sort happens inside the Department. Three checks are worth doing:
If you are overseas, outside the priority sectors and your family applied with you, expect the longest wait of any group.
Whether it is worth bringing the family application forward separately, or waiting to add them after grant, depends on your visa and your family’s situation; that is a question for advice, not a general rule.
A nomination is no longer covered by any processing direction, so nomination timing is now the part of the process the Department has said least about.
Once the visa application is lodged, three things decide its tier: the nominated occupation, the stream (Specialist Skills sits in its own tier), and where the applicant was when they lodged.
For a business recruiting from overseas in construction, health, teaching, agriculture or mining, the change is direct. An offshore candidate in one of those occupations is no longer behind every onshore applicant in the country. For an overseas candidate in any other occupation, the wait is unchanged and still sits behind the onshore queue.
No. Direction 119 was revoked on 19 September 2026. Subclass 482 applications are now ordered under Direction 121, and the other skilled subclasses under Direction 122.
No. Direction 121 and Direction 122 cover visa applications only. Direction 119 covered nominations as well, and no replacement order for nominations has been published.
It means the visa officer picks up your file before files in lower tiers. It does not shorten the checks on the file itself, and the Department has not published tier-by-tier processing times (see our 482 processing time and 186 processing time posts).
Subclasses 186, 187, 189, 190, 191, 489, 491, 494, 887 and 888. Subclass 482 is covered separately by Direction 121.
We check the occupation, salary threshold and nomination timing before you commit to a fee, and tell you where the risk sits.
Matin Amirshahi, Registered Migration Agent (MARN 1685110) · Preston, Melbourne
This article draws on a Migration Institute of Australia (MIA) member notice and official government sources, fully rewritten for Arta Migration readers.